USPTO serial 78850495
OKAO VISION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUTTON, JENNIFER JO
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with OKAO VISION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrew N. Spivak
Andrew N. Spivak MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP2000 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE, NWSUITE 5500WASHINGTON, DC 20006-1888Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for recognizing faces, detecting faces and processing facial images; integrated circuit modules for recognizing faces, detecting faces and processing facial images; computer chip cards for recognizing faces, detecting faces and processing facial images; electronic sensors for recognizing faces, detecting faces and processing facial images; large scale integrated circuits; computer printers; digital cameras and digital video cameras; video display screens for digital cameras, digital video cameras, cellular phones, computers and video game machines; cellular phones; cellular phone software for certifying faces, detecting faces and revising facial images; vehicle operator monitoring apparatus, namely, a monitoring system comprised of sensors, software, digital video cameras and displays for watching drivers' eyes, facial conditions and facial directions in order to monitor safe driving skills; computer programs for digital image processing; electronic locks with face recognition software surveillance video cameras; computer game software for computers, cellular phones and video game machines; video game machines for use with televisions | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Electronic hand-held game units; amusement arcade game machines with displays; electronic video arcade game machines | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | Digital imaging services, namely, electronic imaging, scanning, digitizing, alteration and/or retouching photographic images; providing electronic image processing information and consultation | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Providing online computer games that can be accessed via computers and cellular phones; digital imaging services provided for and by computers and cellular phones; teaching vehicle operation; teaching of beauty skills | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Image processing software design; developing of data processing programs by order of third parties; development, maintenance and updating of software and data bases; providing temporary use of online non-downloadable computer software for face recognition; development, maintenance and updating of software for face recognition | ACTIVE | — |
| 044 | Beauty consultation; providing information about beauty; providing cosmetic analysis information for fitting cosmetics to a person's skin condition or face; providing make-up consultation and application | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Omron Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Omron Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Similar marks named OKAO VISION
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 3, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 10, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 3, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 14, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 16, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 2, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 3, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 9, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 20, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 21, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 21, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 6, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 14, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 13, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 13, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 16, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 16, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 12, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 5, 2006 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |