USPTO serial 78850504
ZIOTRAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AXILBUND, MELVIN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ZIOTRAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Redwood City, CA
Redwood City, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christine B. Redfield
Christine B. Redfield KIRKPATRICK & LOCKHART PRESTON GATES ELLIS LLP630 HANSEN WAYPALO ALTO, CA 94304-1022UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer hardware, diagnostic image processing software, diagnostic image analysis software, diagnostic image archiving software, diagnostic image data processing software, networking software, namely, software for connecting medical network computer users, diagnostic data analysis software, diagnostic data archiving computer software and recording media, namely, CD-Recordable disks in the nature of blank Magnetic Optical disks and blank DVDs, and industrial process control computer programs for controlling diagnostic machines, all for use in the medical field, meteorological field, geophysical field, geological field, geographical field, geospacial field, financial field, industrial field, environmental field, physical field, entertainment, scientific visualization, oceanographical field, cosmetological field, architectural field, civil engineering, space industry, aviatic field, astronomical field, biological field, molecular biological field, and biochemical field; software for rendering of computer tomography images, magnetic resonance images, magnetic resonance angiography images, angiography images, x-ray images, endoscopic views, ultrasonic diagnostic images, brain waves and electrocardiogram | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 6, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 6, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 10, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 11, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 28, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 3, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 9, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 20, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 19, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 19, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 2, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 11, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 28, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 28, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 16, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 12, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 4, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |