USPTO serial 78850511
RECOVERPOINT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FISHER, LATONIA
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RECOVERPOINT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Scott A. Ouellette
SCOTT A OUELLETTE LEGAL DEPTEMC CORPORATION176 S STHOPKINTON, MA 01748Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer Software for data recovery | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 26, 2006 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Oct 26, 2006 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2006 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 16, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 16, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 16, 2006 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 12, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 25, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 25, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 11, 2006 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 5, 2006 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 5, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2006 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 4, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |