USPTO serial 78851008
MKE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SNYDER, NELSON B
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MKE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Matthew Mowers
MATTHEW MOWERS BROOKS KUSHMAN PC1000 TOWM CTR 22ND FLSOUTHFIELD, MI 48075UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Land motor vehicles, namely, automobiles and their structural parts and engines; exterior insignia badges for vehicles; vehicle rooftop cargo, luggage and ski carriers; spare tire covers; fitted motor vehicle covers; bug deflectors for motor vehicles; running boards for motor vehicles; mud flaps for motor vehicles; trailer hitch receiver plugs for motor vehicles; window and windshield sunshades and license plate frames for motor vehicles | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 22, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 22, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 8, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2013 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 23, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 22, 2012 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2012 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 22, 2012 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 24, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2011 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 22, 2011 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 7, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2011 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 6, 2011 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jul 6, 2011 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 6, 2011 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 22, 2011 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jan 20, 2011 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 20, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 22, 2010 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 22, 2010 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 27, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 7, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 23, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 21, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 16, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 16, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 16, 2010 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 30, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 30, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 9, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 9, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 9, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 23, 2009 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 21, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 20, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 20, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 17, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 17, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 17, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 20, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 29, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 28, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 8, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 8, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 8, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 11, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 13, 2007 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 12, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 6, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 5, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 5, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 11, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 10, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 1, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 6, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |