USPTO serial 78851177
A ATEMI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DWYER, JOHN D
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with A ATEMI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Phouphanomketh Ditthavong
PHOUPHANOMKETH DITTHAVONG DITTHAVONG & MORI PC10507 BRADDOCK RD STE AFAIRFAX, VA 22032-2240UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Balls for games, namely basketballs, volleyballs, badminton balls, soccer balls, footballs, table-tennis balls, tennis balls, handballs; rackets and strings for rackets, tennis nets, table-tennis nets, table-tennis tables, table-tennis rackets, gloves for rackets, knee guards for athletic use, fishing rods, fishing reels, fishing hooks, fishing rods holders, fishing sinkers, fishing tackle boxes, artificial fishing bait, fishing lines, fishing floats, fishing creels, landing nets for anglers, fishing tackle bite indicators | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 19, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 19, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 21, 2006 | CEAP | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2006 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 13, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 20, 2006 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |