USPTO serial 78851178
MKA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAMOTHE, LESLEY
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MKA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Matthew Mowers
MATTHEW MOWERS BROOKS KUSHMAN PC1000 TOWN CTR 22ND FLSOUTHFIELD, MI 48075UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Land motor vehicles, namely, automobiles and their structural parts and engines; exterior insignia badges for vehicles; vehicle rooftop carriers, namely, cargo, luggage, and ski carriers; spare tire covers; motor vehicle covers; bug deflectors for motor vehicles; running boards for motor vehicles; mud flaps for motor vehicles; hitch plugs for motor vehicles; sunshades and license plate frames for motor vehicles | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 12, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 12, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 16, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2013 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 14, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 13, 2013 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2012 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 13, 2012 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 17, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2012 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 13, 2012 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 14, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2011 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 12, 2011 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 5, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2011 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 4, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 12, 2011 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 13, 2010 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 18, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 28, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 14, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 12, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 17, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 17, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 16, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 1, 2010 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 11, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 9, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 15, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 15, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 11, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 17, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 3, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 1, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 26, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 26, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 26, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 7, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 17, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 10, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 11, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 10, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 3, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 12, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 9, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 9, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 9, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 9, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 18, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 18, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 18, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 17, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 17, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 6, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |