Drawing for ARCHITAINMENT

USPTO serial 78851277

ARCHITAINMENT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PHAM, LANA H
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ARCHITAINMENT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MURRAY M. LOECHER

ARNELL GROUP LLC7 WORLD TRADE CENTER36TH FLOORNEW YORK, NY 10007

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Business consultation services, namely, promoting business and tourism in the United States, Europe, and Far East; arranging and conducting marketing promotional exhibition events for othersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 27, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 27, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 12, 2008CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Sep 12, 2008COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Sep 11, 2008CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Sep 11, 2008COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Jan 17, 2008EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 21, 2007EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 21, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 17, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 30, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 30, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 27, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 5, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 15, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 11, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 22, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 15, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 15, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 15, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 15, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 14, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 14, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 13, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 11, 2006MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Apr 6, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance