USPTO serial 78852138
CRESCENT DRIVE ENTERTAINMENT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HAYES, GINA CLARK
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CRESCENT DRIVE ENTERTAINMENT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
TJ SINGH
Scott Loras Murray KLEIN, O'NEILL & SINGH, LLP43 Corporate ParkSuite 204Irvine, CA 92606Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Motion picture and television films featuring action, adventure, animation, comedy, drama, or music; prerecorded goods, namely prerecorded records and prerecorded audio and audio-video tapes, cassettes and discs featuring action, adventure, animation, comedy, drama, or music; film clips featuring action, adventure, animation, comedy, drama, or music within cassettes used with hand-held viewers or projectors; audio, video, audio and video tape, cassette, disc playback and recorders | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Crescent Drive Entertainment, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Crescent Drive Entertainment, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named CRESCENT DRIVE ENTERTAINMENT
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 5, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 5, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 14, 2009 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 8, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 6, 2009 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2009 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 6, 2009 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 16, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 16, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 4, 2008 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 25, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 6, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 23, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 23, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 6, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 12, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 22, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 23, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 20, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 13, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 4, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 4, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 14, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 6, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |