USPTO serial 78852392
DB DESIGNER BRANDS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DEFORD, JEFFREY S
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DB DESIGNER BRANDS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 002 | Colorants for use in the manufacture of cosmetics | ACTIVE | — |
| 003 | Aloe vera gel for cosmetic purposes; Astringents for cosmetic purposes; Bath oils for cosmetic purposes; Body and beauty care cosmetics; Cleansing creams ; Coloring preparations for cosmetic purposes; Concealers ; Cosmetic balls; Cosmetic creams; Cosmetic creams for skin care; Cosmetic facial blotting papers; Cosmetic milks; Cosmetic oils; Cosmetic oils for the epidermis; Cosmetic pads; Cosmetic pencils; Cosmetic preparations against sunburn; Cosmetic preparations for body care; Cosmetic preparations for eye lashes; Cosmetic preparations for skin renewal; Cosmetic preparations for the care of mouth and teeth; Cosmetic products in the form of aerosols for skin care; Cosmetic products in the form of aerosols for skincare; Cosmetic rouges; Cosmetic soaps; Cosmetic sun-protecting preparations; Cosmetic sun-tanning preparations; Cosmetic suntan lotions; Cosmetics; Cosmetics namely, compacts; Cotton balls for cosmetic purposes; Cotton buds for cosmetic purposes; Cotton for cosmetic purposes; Cotton puffs for cosmetic purposes; Cotton sticks for cosmetic purposes; Cotton swabs for cosmetic purposes; Decorative transfers and skin jewels for cosmetic purposes; Eye compresses for cosmetic purposes; Face creams for cosmetic use; Foams containing cosmetics and sunscreens; Foundation ; Gauze for cosmetic purposes; Henna for cosmetic purposes; Make-up kits comprised of colour cosmetics; Nail varnish for cosmetic purposes; Nutritional oils for cosmetic purposes; Pencils for cosmetic purposes; Perfume oils for the manufacture of cosmetic preparations; Petroleum jelly for cosmetic purposes; Pre-moistened cosmetic tissues; Pre-moistened cosmetic towelettes; Pre-moistened cosmetic wipes; Rose oil for cosmetic purposes; Shampoos ; Soaps ; Toners ; Topical skin sprays for cosmetic purposes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 23, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 22, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 18, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 18, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 7, 2006 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |