USPTO serial 78852578
LAMMAX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PERKINS, ELLEN J
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LAMMAX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Perla M. Kuhn
HUGHES HUBBARD & REED LLP HUGHES HUBBARD & REED LLPONE BATTERY PARK PLZNEW YORK, NY 10004-1482UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | Wall tiles, floor tiles, wall covering materials and floor paving, all the aforementioned goods made of ceramic, stoneware and porcelain materials | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | Decorative panels | ACTIVE | — |
| 027 | Floor coverings | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Wholesale and retail store services and online retail store services all featuring wall tiles, floor tiles, wall covering materials and floor paving, and floor coverings | ACTIVE | — |
| 039 | Distribution services namely, delivery of wall tiles, floor tiles, wall covering materials and floor paving, and floor coverings | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Saloni Portugal-Materiais De Construcao Lda.
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 027
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Similar marks named LAMMAX
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 7, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 6, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 30, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 12, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 12, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 12, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 12, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 12, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 11, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 15, 2007 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2007 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 25, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 25, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 23, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 23, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 23, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 21, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 18, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 18, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 7, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |