USPTO serial 78852797
MM-IX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- OKEKE, BENJAMIN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MM-IX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Peter J. Riebling
Peter J. Riebling Katten Muchin Rosenman LLPSuite 2002900 K Street, N.W.Washington, DC 20007-5118Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | PREMIUM SHORT MESSAGING SERVICES (SMS) BILLING AND WIRELESS APPLICATION PROTOCOL (WAP) PUSH BILLING SERVICES | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | TELECOMMUNICATIONS ACCESS SERVICES; ELECTRONIC DATA AND SIGNAL TRANSMISSION SERVICES; MOBILE TELEPHONE COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES,INCLUDING TEXT AND LANGUAGE NEWS, AND PROVIDING ACCESS TO AND STREAMING OF DOWNLOADABLE VIDEO, AUDIO, DIGITAL SIGNALS, GAMES, BELL TONES, FILES, PROGRAMS, LOGOS, DATA, VOICES, SCREEN SAVERS, AND MUSIC; PROVIDING ACCESS TO AND STREAMING OF BELL TONES ON WIRELESS INTERNET FOR MOBILE TELEPHONES; TRANSMISSION OF VIDEO, AUDIO, DATA, DIGITAL SIGNALS, TEXT, GAMES AND MUSIC ON WIRELESS INTERNET FOR MOBILE TELEPHONES AND ELECTRONIC DEVICES; TRANSMISSION AND BROADCASTING OF COMMUNICATIONS, DATA, IMAGES, TEXT, VIDEO, GRAPHICS, DIGITAL SIGNALS, AND AUDIO CONTENT VIA TELECOMMUNICATIONS NETWORKS; COMMUNICATION SERVICES, NAMELY, ELECTRONIC AND DIGITAL TRANSMISSION OF TEXT, CONTENT, AUDIO, VIDEO, IMAGES, GRAPHICS, DIGITAL SIGNALS, NOTIFICATIONS, PHOTOGRAPHS, NEWS, DATA, FILES, SOUNDS, GAMES, RING TONES, WALLPAPER, SHORT MESSAGING SERVICES (SMS), SMS ALERTS, WIRELESS APPLICATION PROTOCOL (WAP) PUSH ALERTS, MULTIMEDIA MESSAGING SERVICES (MMS) COMPRISED OF IMAGES, RINGTONES, TRUETONES, REALTONES, VOICE TONES, SOUND EFFECTS, AUDIO AND VIDEO CLIPS, AND INSTANT MESSAGING SERVICES; ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION AND BROADCASTING OF DIGITAL SIGNALS AND INTERACTIVE INFORMATION VIA GLOBAL LAND AND WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS, TELECOMMUNICATIONS NETWORKS, CABLE NETWORKS, RADIO FREQUENCIES, AND SATELLITE NETWORKS; ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION OF WIRELESS APPLICATION PROTOCOL MESSAGES; PROVIDING CONNECTIVITY SERVICES, NAMELY;, PROVIDING TELECOMMUNICATIONS CONNECTIONS AND ACCESS TO GLOBAL LAND AND WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS NETWORKS, RADIO FREQUENCIES, SATELLITE NETWORKS, CABLE NETWORKS, MOBILE IP AND ON-LINE INTERNET | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 28, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 28, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 17, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 16, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 27, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 27, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 24, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 24, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 24, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 3, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 7, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 27, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 27, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 27, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 27, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 4, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 15, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 24, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 24, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 3, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 3, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 3, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 5, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 5, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 4, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 7, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |