Drawing for MM-IX

USPTO serial 78852825

MM-IX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
OKEKE, BENJAMIN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MM-IX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Peter J. Riebling

Peter J. Riebling KATTEN MUCHIN ROSENMAN LLP2900 K Street, N.W.Suite 200WASHINGTON, DC 20007-5118

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software which enables users to connect to or access global land and wireless communications networks, radio frequencies, telecommunications networks, cable networks, satellite networks, mobile Internet protocol (IP), and on-line Internet; providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software which enables users to electronically and digitally transmit, download, and use text, content, data, audio, video, voices, images, graphics, digital signals, notifications, photographs, news, music, files, sounds, games, ring tones, bell tones, wallpaper, short messages, short message alerts, wireless application protocol (WAP) push alerts, instant messages, premium short messaging service billing, WAP push alerts billing, digital signals and interactive information, and wireless application protocol messages; providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software which enables users to electronically and digitally transmit, download, and use multimedia messages, namely, images, ringtones, truetones, realtones, voice tones, sound effects, and audio and video clips; providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software which enables users to electronically and digitally transmit, download, and use computer security and identity/profile data, namely, single sign-on (SSO), authentication, data encryption, parental controls, age verification, and location-based usage controlsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 26, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 26, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 8, 2009EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Oct 8, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Sep 25, 2009EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Sep 25, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 25, 2009EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Mar 25, 2009EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Mar 25, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 7, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 25, 2008EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 25, 2008EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 25, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 24, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 24, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 24, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 24, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 25, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 3, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 13, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 31, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
May 30, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 30, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 30, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
May 30, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 30, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 29, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 3, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
May 3, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 3, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 5, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 5, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 4, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 14, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 7, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance