USPTO serial 78852886
TEETYAS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GARDNER, DAWNA BERYL
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TEETYAS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Francisco, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Beverages made of coffee; Beverages made of tea; Black tea ; Bonbons made of sugar; Caffeine-free coffee; Cakes of sugar-bounded millet or popped rice (okoshi); Candy with cocoa; Chicory based coffee substitute; Chinese rice noodles (bifun, uncooked); Cocoa; Cocoa ; Cocoa beverages with milk; Cocoa extracts for human consumption; Cocoa mixes; Cocoa spreads; Cocoa-based ingredient in confectionery products; Coffee; Coffee ; Coffee beans; Coffee flavored syrup used in making food beverages; Coffee pods; Coffee substitutes ; Coffee substitutes ; Coffee-based beverage containing milk; Crystal sugar ; Crystal sugar pieces ; Cube sugar; Dough-based pockets with filling consisting primarily of pasta or rice; Dried cooked-rice; Dried sugared cakes of rice flour (rakugan); Enriched rice ; Flavourings of tea; Flour for making dumplings of glutinous rice; Fruit teas; Green tea; Ground coffee beans; Herb tea ; Herbal tea ; Husked rice; Iced tea; Instant coffee; Japanese green tea; Lime tea; Oolong tea ; Pellet-shaped rice crackers (arare); Pounded rice cakes (mochi); Powdered sugar; Prepared cocoa and cocoa-based beverages; Prepared coffee and coffee-based beverages; Puffed rice; Rice; Rice cakes; Rice crackers ; Rice dumplings dressed with sweet bean jam (ankoro); Rice flour; Rice noodles; Rice pudding; Rice salad; Rice starch flour; Rice-based snack foods; Roasted coffee beans; Sage tea; Soft pin-rolled cakes of pounded rice (gyuhi); Sugar; Sugar and sugar substitutes; Sugar substitutes; Sugar-coated coffee beans; Sugar-coated hard caramels; Sugar-free chewing gum; Sugared beans (ama-natto); Sweet bean jam coated with sugared-bean based soft shell ; Sweet pounded rice cakes (mochi-gashi); Tea; Tea for infusions; Tea of parched powder of barley with husk (mugi-cha); Tea of salty kelp powder (kombu-cha); Tea pods; Tea substitutes; Tea-based beverages with fruit flavoring; Theine-free tea sweetened with sweeteners; White sugar; Wholemeal rice | ACTIVE | Mar 1, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 13, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 14, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 7, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |