Drawing for IPRODUCTS

USPTO serial 78852901

IPRODUCTS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
FATHY, DOMINIC
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with IPRODUCTS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Susan L. Heller

Susan L. Heller Greenberg Traurig, LLP2450 Colorado Avenue, Suite 400ESanta Monica, CA 90404UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036Banking services, mutual fund investment advisory services, investment management services and financial services in the nature of pooled investment fundsACTIVEFeb 5, 2010

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 15, 2010MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 15, 2010ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 5, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 5, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 5, 2010CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 12, 2010SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE
Feb 5, 2010IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED
Feb 5, 2010EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Dec 23, 2009ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP
Dec 16, 2009ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP
Aug 31, 2009EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED
Aug 31, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Aug 4, 2009EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED
Aug 4, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 27, 2009EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Jan 27, 2009EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Jan 27, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 11, 2008CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED
Sep 11, 2008COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED
Jul 15, 2008EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Jul 15, 2008EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Jul 15, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 5, 2008EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Feb 5, 2008EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Feb 5, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 30, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Jul 30, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Jul 30, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 6, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 14, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 25, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Sep 24, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Sep 22, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Sep 18, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Sep 14, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 11, 2006MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED
Apr 7, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance