Drawing for AMERICA'S GOT TALENT

USPTO serial 78852981

AMERICA'S GOT TALENT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LAMOTHE, LESLEY
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AMERICA'S GOT TALENT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Steven M. Weinberg

Steven M. Weinberg Holmes Weinberg, PC30765 Pacific Coast HighwaySuite 411Malibu, CA 90265

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Prerecorded audio and video cassettes, compact discs, video discs, records, and CD-ROMs, all of the foregoing featuring talent shows; video game machine that is adapted or intended for use with the television, monitor or some other form of video display apparatus; computer game equipment containing memory devices, namely, disc; interactive video game programs; electronically or magnetically activated pre-paid telephone debit cards; magnets, interactive computer game software downloaded from a global computer network; eyeglasses and sunglasses; gaming machines; gaming equipment, namely, slot machines with or without video output; wireless telephones; radios; MP3 players, CD players; portable carrying cases for MP3 players; portable carrying cases for CD playersACTIVE—
016Posters, calendars, notebooks, binders, daily personal organizers, memopads, stickers, comic books, writing paper, envelopes, greeting cards, paper coasters, paper mats, newspapers for general circulation, books and magazines in the field of talent shows, newsletters in the field of talent shows, photographs, postcards, trading cards, cardboard stand-up cutouts featuring photographs or artwork, prepaid phone debit cards without magnetic coding, trading card milk bottle caps, and personal checkbooks, paper party decorations, paper party bags, paper party favors and paper party hatsACTIVE—
025Clothing, namely, rainwear, sweat shirts, jerseys, shorts, sweat pants, jackets, hats, caps, scarves, gloves, hosiery, neckties, pajamas, robes, night shirts, night gowns, underwear, head bands, wrist bands, swim suits, skirts, shirts, tank tops, pants, coats, sweaters, leotards, leg warmers, stockings, socks, panty hose, tights, belts; footwear, namely, shoes, athletic shoes, slippers, boots, sandals; and headwear, namely, hats and capsACTIVE—
028Target games, board games and card games, kites, toy action figures, disc-type toss toys, bows and arrows, balls of all kinds, dolls, doll playsets, plush toys, toy vehicles, toy cars, toy trucks, toy bucket and shovel sets, roller skates, toy rockets, toy guns, toy holsters, musical toys, jigsaw puzzles, badminton sets, bubble making wands and solution sets, toy figurines, toy banks, puppets, toy balloons, yo-yos, skateboards, toy scooters, face masks, stand alone video game machines, LCD game machines, hand held unit for playing electronic games, but specifically excluding dice games and computer software games, lottery tickets and lottery games, playing cardsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ARAA): This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 15, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 15, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 20, 2010ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 20, 2010REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 1, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 1, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 27, 2009EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jul 27, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jul 1, 2009EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jul 1, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 15, 2008EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Dec 15, 2008EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Dec 15, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 17, 2008DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jul 2, 2008DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Jul 2, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 1, 2008EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jul 1, 2008EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jul 1, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 17, 2007EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 17, 2007EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 17, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 10, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 10, 2007DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jul 25, 2007DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Jul 25, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 27, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 27, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 27, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 13, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 13, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 2, 2007CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jan 2, 2007COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Jan 2, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 10, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 20, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 29, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 25, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 24, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Aug 23, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 23, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 23, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 21, 2006ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Aug 21, 2006PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Jul 19, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 19, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 11, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jul 10, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 10, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jul 10, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jun 30, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 19, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 19, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 5, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 5, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 9, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 8, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 6, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 7, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance