USPTO serial 78853324
IPHOX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EDWARDS, ALICIA COLLINS
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with IPHOX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
St. Helier, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Todd Braverman, Esq.
TODD BRAVERMAN ESQ BRYAN CAVE LLP1290 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10104-0101UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software including software downloadable from the Internet and other interactive electronic platforms for telecommunications, telephony, VOIP, broadband, wireless telecommunications, e-mail, wireless streaming; telecommunications installations, apparatus and instruments and parts and fittings therefor, namely, telephones, cellular telephones, combination cellular telephones and personal digital assistants, pagers, combination cellular telephones and digital media players, telecommunications network management apparatus, namely, telecommunication consoles, routers and modems; telephones, telephone headsets; electronic communication devices, namely, wireless headsets and headphones; wireless communication devices, namely, cellular telephones, Internet tablets, digital media players, combination cellular telephones and personal digital assistants; cellular and wireless telephones; telephony systems comprised of telephones, consoles, routers and modems; computer hardware; computer peripherals; apparatus and instruments for recording, storage, processing, analysis, transmission, distribution and/or display of data; computer hardware and firmware for use in the field of telecommunications; computer hardware and software for interconnecting, managing, securing and operating local and wide area networks and telephony systems; computer software for facilitating Internet-based telephone calls; parts and fittings for all the aforesaid goods; downloadable software that allows subscribers to utilize VOIP communication services | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Telecommunication services, namely, providing electronic telecommunications connections; communications via electronic platforms, namely, providing electronic telecommunications connections; providing voice over Internet protocol (VOIP) peer-to-peer communications; electronic transmission of data and documents over computer terminals and instant messaging services; providing a high speed access to area networks and a global computer information network; electronic data interchange services; information and advisory services relating to all the aforesaid services including such services provided via the Internet | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Design and development for others of computer software and hardware; computer services and software development for others, namely, design of computer software and hardware for use in telecommunications and voice over Internet protocol (VOIP) applications, Internet to Internet telephone calls, data transmission and instant messaging services; creating and maintaining web sites for others; hosting web sites of others on a computer server for a global computer network; installation and maintenance of computer software; providing temporary use of online, non-downloadable computer software that allows subscribers to utilize VOIP communication services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 1, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 1, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 2, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 9, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 27, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 25, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 22, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 22, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 7, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 20, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 30, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 19, 2007 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 3, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 2, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 2, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 2, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 12, 2007 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 18, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 18, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 16, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 11, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 11, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 11, 2007 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 11, 2007 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 3, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 3, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 20, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 20, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 15, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 11, 2006 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Apr 11, 2006 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 7, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |