USPTO serial 78854131
OVERNIGHT GLOW
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RINKER, ANTHONY MICHAEL
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with OVERNIGHT GLOW?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Charles J. Meyer
Charles J. Meyer Woodard, Emhardt, Moriarty, McNett & Henry LLP111 Monument Circle, Suite 3700INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46204UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Facial and body moisturizers; self-tanning preparations; skin cleaners; exfoliating preparations for the body; indoor and outdoor tanning preparations; and pre-moistened cosmetic towelettes impregnated with at least one of the following, facial and body moisturizers, self-tanning preparations, skin cleaners, exfoliating preparations, indoor and outdoor tanning preparations | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 27, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 27, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 14, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 14, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 5, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 28, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 28, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 13, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 19, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 29, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 27, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 20, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 17, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 17, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 17, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 16, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 16, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 3, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 3, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 31, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 31, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 29, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 10, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |