Drawing for CREPEMANIA

USPTO serial 78854197

CREPEMANIA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 607
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MADDEN, ANNE
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CREPEMANIA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey M. Furr

Jeffrey M. Furr Furr Law Firm2622 Debolt RoadUtica, OH 43080UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Crepe manufacturing machinesACTIVEAug 13, 2007
030Crepes; cooking mixes, namely, crepe mixesACTIVEAug 13, 2007

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 23, 2008MAB7ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT—
May 23, 2008ABN7ABANDONMENT - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT—
Oct 17, 2007GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 17, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 17, 2007CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 31, 2007SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Aug 13, 2007IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Aug 13, 2007EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Apr 27, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 13, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 21, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 1, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 29, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 22, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 17, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 16, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 11, 2006MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Apr 10, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance