USPTO serial 78854479
SPRING FACTORS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCMORROW, RONALD G
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SPRING FACTORS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Dietary and nutritional supplements; Herbal supplements | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 28, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 28, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 30, 2010 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2010 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 22, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 22, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 16, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 8, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 8, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 1, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 23, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 23, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 20, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 20, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 19, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 25, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 17, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 17, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 6, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 6, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 3, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 7, 2007 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2007 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 6, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 6, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 2, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 26, 2007 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 26, 2007 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 26, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 17, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 16, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 16, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 29, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 29, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 26, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 11, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |