Drawing for MILLENNIUM SYSTEMS

USPTO serial 78854535

MILLENNIUM SYSTEMS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CROWLEY, SEAN MICHAEL
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MILLENNIUM SYSTEMS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Gregory Richardson

GREGORY RICHARDSON LAW OFFICES OF GREGORY RICHARDSON3890 11TH ST STE 210RIVERSIDE, CA 92501-3524UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer networking hardwareACTIVEJan 26, 1997

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 21, 2008MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 2, 2008EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Apr 30, 2008EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jan 17, 2008GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jan 17, 2008GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jan 17, 2008CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Nov 18, 2007EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Nov 18, 2007JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 18, 2007EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Nov 12, 2007ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 24, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 23, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 23, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 18, 2007GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jun 18, 2007GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jun 18, 2007CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Jun 8, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 4, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 4, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 11, 2007GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 11, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 11, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 11, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 7, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 7, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 27, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 27, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 16, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 12, 2006MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Apr 11, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance