USPTO serial 78854872
X WAKEFIELD ST ANDREWS CABERNET SAUVIGNON CLARE VALLEY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MEIER, SHARON A
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with X WAKEFIELD ST ANDREWS CABERNET SAUVIGNON CLARE VALLEY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Petersham NSW, AU
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sheldon H. Klein
SHELDON H KLEIN ARENT FOX PLLC1050 CONNECTICUT AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20036-5303UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | Wine | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 4, 2009 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 4, 2009 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 4, 2009 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 20, 2008 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jun 4, 2008 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2008 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2008 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 11, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 4, 2008 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2008 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2008 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 5, 2007 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 5, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 26, 2007 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 19, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 15, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 15, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 24, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 24, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 24, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 22, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 22, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 12, 2006 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |