USPTO serial 78855522
CH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHOE, KELLY
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Afschineh Latifi
AFSCHINEH LATIFI TUCKER & LATIFI LLP160 E 84TH ST APT 5ENEW YORK, NY 10028-0056UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | Bags, namely, handbags, shoulder bags, tote bags, clutches, wallets, luggage, back packs and umbrellas | ACTIVE | Jan 5, 1990 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 22, 2009 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 6, 2009 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 6, 2009 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 3, 2008 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Aug 9, 2008 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2008 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2008 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 11, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 18, 2008 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 18, 2008 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 25, 2007 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 25, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 29, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 29, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 28, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 28, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 28, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 7, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 7, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 12, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 12, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 20, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 17, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 12, 2006 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |