Drawing for VIEWSAT LITE

USPTO serial 78855580

VIEWSAT LITE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BORSUK, ESTHER
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with VIEWSAT LITE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Manuel F. de la Cerra

John L. Roberts Law Office of Manuel De La Cerra6885 Catamaran DriveCarlsbad, CA 92011UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Satellite receivers, namely, integrated receiver/decoder set-top-boxes that receive only one-way direct-to-home free-to-air satellite television broadcasts, and excluding two-way broadband satellite communicationsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 1, 2010MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Jan 29, 2010ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Jan 29, 2010OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Nov 13, 2009OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Jan 9, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 22, 2006OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Dec 22, 2006OPPFOPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Dec 5, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 15, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 12, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 6, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 3, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 19, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 19, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 18, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 13, 2006MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Apr 12, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance