CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for ADRENABUZZ

USPTO serial 78855838

ADRENABUZZ

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PENDLETON, CAROLYN A
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ADRENABUZZ?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lee Grosskreuz Hechtel

LEE GROSSKREUZ HECHTEL NBTY INC90 ORVILLE DRBOHEMIA, NY 11716UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Vitamins, minerals and nutritional supplements; powdered nutritional supplement drink mixACTIVE—
029Protein-based foods and beverages, namely nutrient-dense food barsACTIVE—
030Grain-based nutrient-dense food bars also containing cerealsACTIVE—
032Ready-to-drink beverages, namely sports energy drinksACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 14, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 20, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 5, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 13, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 21, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 23, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 23, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 21, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 21, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Dec 21, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 21, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 14, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 14, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 14, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 14, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 29, 2006ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Nov 18, 2006PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Oct 18, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 13, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 12, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 5, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 4, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 4, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 17, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 17, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 17, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 12, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance