USPTO serial 78856475
MIUCHIZ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STRUCK, ROBERT J
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MIUCHIZ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | CALCULATORS; CASES FOR EYEGLASSES; CASES FOR SUNGLASSES; CELLULAR TELEPHONES; COMPACT DISC PLAYERS; COMPUTER GAME CARTRIDGES; COMPUTER GAME SOFTWARE; DIGITAL CAMERAS; DVD MACHINES; ELECTRONIC GAME SOFTWARE FOR HAND ELECTRONIC DEVICES; INTERACTIVE HAND HELD REMOTE CONTROLS FOR PLAYING ELECTRONIC GAMES AND INTERACTION IN A VIRTUAL COMMUNITY VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK; JOYSTICKS FOR COMPUTER AND VIDEO GAMES; KARAOKE MACHINES; MOBILE RADIO SETS SOLD AS A UNIT; MOTION PICTURE FILMS FEATURING ANIMATED AND NON-ANIMATED CHARACTERS ABOUT COMEDY, YOUTH ACTIVITIES, YOUTH ADVENTURES AND YOUTH ISSUES; MP3 PLAYERS; PHOTOGRAPHIC CAMERAS; PROTECTIVE HELMETS; PRE-RECORDED COMPACT DISCS, DVDS AND VIDEOCASSETTES FEATURING ANIMATED AND/OR NON-ANIMATED CHARACTERS AND MUSIC; RADIOS; SUNGLASSES; SWIM GOGGLES; TELEVISIONS; VIDEOCASSETTE PLAYERS/RECORDERS; VIDEO DISC PLAYERS; VIDEO GAME CARTRIDGES; AND VIDEO GAME SOFTWARE | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 24, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 24, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 25, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 25, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 26, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 3, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 13, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 21, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 11, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 2, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 25, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 24, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 19, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 17, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 17, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 11, 2006 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jul 10, 2006 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jun 29, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 12, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |