Drawing for WE'VE GOT YOU COVERED

USPTO serial 78856555

WE'VE GOT YOU COVERED

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BOONE, JOHN C
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WE'VE GOT YOU COVERED?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Brian T. Jaenicke

Brian T. Jaenicke Johnson & JohnsonOne Johnson & Johnson PlazaNew Brunswick, NJ 08933-7001UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005adhesive bandagesACTIVE—
016printed materials, namely, articles, reports, newsletters, brochures, pamphlets, flyers, and booklets relating to first aid, wound care and related topicsACTIVE—
041education services, namely, programs to educate consumers on how to treat and heal cuts and wounds and related topicsACTIVE—
044online information services, namely, providing information relating to first aid, wound care and related topicsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 18, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 18, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 14, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 22, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 2, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 16, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 16, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 16, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 18, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Dec 3, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 3, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 18, 2007GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 18, 2007GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 18, 2007CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
May 15, 2007GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 15, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 24, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Apr 24, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 24, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 22, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 17, 2006UNDCUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED—
Sep 28, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 27, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 18, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 20, 2006MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Apr 12, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance