CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for SUGARVOD

USPTO serial 78856580

SUGARVOD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SINGLETON, RUDY
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SUGARVOD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Matthew H. Swyers, Esq.

MATTHEW H SWYERS ESQ THE SWYERS LAW FIRM PLLC344 MAPLE AVE W STE 389VIENNA, VA 22180UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038Streaming of adult-themed video material on the Internet; and Adult-themed video-on-demand transmission services.ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 28, 2008MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 27, 2008ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 27, 2008EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 7, 2008EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Aug 11, 2007GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 11, 2007GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 11, 2007CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Jun 21, 2007JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 17, 2007GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
May 17, 2007CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Mar 5, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 5, 2007EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Mar 5, 2007JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Mar 5, 2007EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Feb 23, 2007GNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED—
Feb 23, 2007CNCFACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED—
Jan 25, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 24, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 24, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 19, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 19, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 19, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 19, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 6, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 6, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 1, 2006GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 1, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 27, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 26, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 26, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 26, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 19, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 19, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 18, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 13, 2006MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Apr 12, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance