Drawing for NATURAL BEAUTY INNOVATIONS

USPTO serial 78856593

NATURAL BEAUTY INNOVATIONS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MONINGHOFF, KIM TERESA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NATURAL BEAUTY INNOVATIONS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Molly B. Markley

MOLLY B. MARKLEY YOUNG & BASILE, P.C.3001 W. BIG BEAVER ROADSUITE 624TROY, MI 48084-3107

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003SKIN CARE PRODUCTS, NAMELY, SKIN LOTIONS, SOAPS, CLEANSERS, GELS, CREAMS, MOISTURIZERS, CLARIFIERS, TONERS, AND NON-MEDICATED SERUMS; COSMETICS; HAIR CARE PRODUCTS, NAMELY, SHAMPOOS, CONDITIONERS, GELS, SPRAYS, CREAMS, MOUSSES, AND HAIR CARE PREPARATIONSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 9, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 9, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 13, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 12, 2010EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Oct 8, 2010EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Oct 8, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 13, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 12, 2010EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Apr 8, 2010EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Apr 8, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 13, 2009EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Oct 8, 2009EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Oct 8, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 29, 2009ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Apr 10, 2009EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Apr 8, 2009EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Apr 8, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 10, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 10, 2008AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Oct 8, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 8, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 1, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 8, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 15, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 26, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 12, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 11, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 20, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 20, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 19, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 16, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 16, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 15, 2007FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Nov 15, 2007FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
May 15, 2007GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 15, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 23, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 23, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 23, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 21, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 21, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 21, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 18, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 13, 2006MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Apr 12, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance