USPTO serial 78856652
MILKHOUSE GOODS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- POWER, MARGARET
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MILKHOUSE GOODS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
North St. Paul, MN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stephen R. Bergerson
DEAN R KARAU FREDRIKSON & BYRON PA200 SOUTH SIXTH STREETSUITE 4000MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-1425Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Powdered dairy-based beverage mixes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 29, 2011 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 6, 2011 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 6, 2011 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 22, 2011 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Mar 27, 2008 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2008 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 5, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 27, 2007 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 27, 2007 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 4, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 1, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 2, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 2, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 2, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 3, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 25, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 25, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 18, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 20, 2006 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Apr 12, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |