Drawing for 2C: 2ND CHANCE

USPTO serial 78856741

2C: 2ND CHANCE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MURRAY, DAVID T
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with 2C: 2ND CHANCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Charlene M. Krogh

Charlene M. Krogh Dorsey & Whitney LLPIP Department370 Seventeenth Street, Suite 4700Denver, CO 80202-5647

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Entertainment in the nature of an on-going television program in the field of health, fitness, food nutrition, exercise, personal development and achievement, wellness and weight management; production of television shows broadcast over television, satellite, radio, video media and the Internet; entertainment services, namely, providing television programs in the field of health, fitness, food nutrition, exercise, personal development and achievement, wellness and weight management; providing information regarding exercise and fitness via a global computer networkACTIVE—
044Providing information regarding food nutrition and weight management via a global computer networkACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 7, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 7, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 10, 2009EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Dec 10, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Nov 9, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 8, 2009EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
May 8, 2009EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
May 8, 2009EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
May 8, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 14, 2009ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Sep 16, 2008EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Sep 16, 2008EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Sep 16, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 6, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 18, 2008CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Apr 18, 2008COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Apr 11, 2008EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Apr 11, 2008EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Apr 11, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 6, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 13, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 31, 2007ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Oct 18, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 18, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 18, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 8, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 13, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 24, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 21, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 21, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 6, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 22, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 22, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 20, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 22, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 25, 2006GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jul 25, 2006CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jul 13, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 13, 2006MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Apr 12, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance