Drawing for MIA MODA

USPTO serial 78856865

MIA MODA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WEBSTER, WILLIAM M
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MIA MODA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Elliott J. Stein, Esq.

Elliott J. Stein Stevens & Lee, P.C.100 Lenox DriveSuite 200Lawrenceville, NJ 08648

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
018Infant carriers worn on the bodyACTIVE—
024Infant and children's blankets, bed pads, mattress pads, crib bumper pads and covers for blankets, mattresses, pillows and bumpersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 19, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 19, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 1, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 18, 2009EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Sep 18, 2009EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Sep 18, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 18, 2009EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Mar 18, 2009EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Mar 18, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 19, 2008EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 19, 2008DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Aug 18, 2008AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Aug 13, 2008EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Aug 13, 2008DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Aug 13, 2008FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Aug 13, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 15, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 15, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 15, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 18, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 26, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 6, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 24, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 20, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 19, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 19, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 19, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 16, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 19, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 19, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 18, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 13, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance