Drawing for ROMA PIZZA & PASTA

USPTO serial 78857590

ROMA PIZZA & PASTA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MICKLEBURGH, LINDA BOHANNON
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with ROMA PIZZA & PASTA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Wm. Lee Horn

Feras Abualrob Roma Pizza and Pasta, LLC1526 Puryear PlaceBrentwood, TN 37027UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Garden saladsABANDONEDOct 24, 2000
030Pizza; Prepared pasta; SandwichesABANDONEDOct 24, 2000
039Pizza deliveryABANDONEDOct 24, 2000

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 4, 2010UNDRUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - CORRESP. REMAILED—
Feb 23, 2010MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Feb 23, 2010ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Feb 23, 2010OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Feb 23, 2010OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Nov 3, 2008OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Nov 3, 2008OPPFOPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Oct 21, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 1, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 16, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 16, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 16, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 16, 2008GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 16, 2008GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 16, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 15, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 11, 2008GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Sep 11, 2008GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Sep 11, 2008CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Sep 5, 2008ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Aug 29, 2008PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Aug 15, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 15, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 17, 2007NAUDREPORT UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - COMPLETED—
Jun 11, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 11, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 6, 2007FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
May 17, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 17, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 8, 2006GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 8, 2006CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Oct 31, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 30, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 30, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 25, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 25, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 19, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 15, 2006MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Apr 14, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance