USPTO serial 78858005
IMAGINACION EN ACCION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CRAWFORD, MARY
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with IMAGINACION EN ACCION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Catherine Mennenga
Catherine Mennenga GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY3135 EASTON TPKEFAIRFIELD, CT 06828-0001UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Remote monitoring services of machinery, motors, engines, turbines, generators, compressors, locomotives, reactors, electrical equipment, factory automation and control instruments and equipment, electric and gas cooking, heating, refrigerating, washing, drying, air conditioning and ventilating appliances and apparatus, consumer electronic products, electric lighting apparatus and installations, computers, medical equipment and accessories, transit vehicles, off highway equipment, telecommunication equipment and accessories, including accessories and component parts of all the foregoing; remote monitoring services for gas and steam turbine power plants and for all types of power generation, transmission and/or distribution plants and facilities including accessories and component parts of all the foregoing; research, consultation and advisory services all relating to engineering, design and development problems encountered by utility, industrial and commercial companies, governments and individuals; computer equipment leasing; computer programming services for others; computer software design and analysis services for others; computer consultation services; maintenance and updating of computer software and computer systems for others; installation of computer software; computer systems analysis and design services for others; network analysis and design services for others; computer services, namely, designing, implementing and maintaining web sites and web pages for others; providing computer search engines for obtaining data on a global computer network; consultancy services relating to chemical research; consultancy services relating to the discovery and evaluation of drugs and compounds having diagnostic properties; technical support services; consultancy services relating to methods for diagnosis using laser based optical systems; high through put screening assays for drug development services; customer synthesis, analytical and diagnostic services; biotechnological services; technical support services for factory automation software, namely, providing maintenance of computer software and providing periodic upgrades of the software; custom design of security access systems; design and consulting services in connection with the configuration of systems used in applications supporting fiber optic technology; technical support services, namely, troubleshooting of problems with computer hardware, video and electronic communication hardware, and software; technical consultation services for hardware and software used in connection with security and access systems; technical consultation services for surveillance cameras; custom design services for others in the fields of security systems, access systems, and tangible asset and inventory monitoring systems; laboratory and testing services for fluid separation and membrane testing; engineering and consulting services in the fields of water treatment, aqueous systems, cooling water systems, industrial boiler water systems, industrial water and process systems, industrial fuel processing system treatment, pulp and papermaking system treatment, and metal and plastic processing system treatment; engineering services and technical support services related to the design and configuration of computer software and hardware systems to be used in the treatment of aqueous systems and in the treatment of pulp and papermaking systems, petroleum and petrochemical processing systems, and metal and plastic finishing operations; providing information to others, over a global computer network, relating to industrial water purification systems; advisory services related to all the aforesaid | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 29, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 29, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 21, 2009 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 17, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 26, 2009 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 27, 2009 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 27, 2009 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 8, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 8, 2008 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 29, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 29, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 25, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 25, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 27, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 5, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 15, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 14, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 12, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 2, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 28, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 28, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 25, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 25, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 19, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 15, 2006 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |