USPTO serial 78858136
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
POWAY, CA
POWAY, CA
POWAY, CA
Poway, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Charles B. Witham
Charles B. Witham Seltzer Caplan McMahon Vitek750 B Street2100 Symphony TowersSan Diego, CA 92101| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Credit card services; Credit card transaction processing services; Financial services, namely, money lending; Issuing credit cards | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | Mar 7, 2007 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 13, 2010 | C7.. | CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL | — |
| Dec 30, 2009 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 8, 2009 | C7RF | REQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2009 | ES7S | TEAS SECTION 7 SURRENDER RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 17, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 17, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 19, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 4, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 14, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 1, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 31, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 29, 2007 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 26, 2007 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Oct 26, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 24, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 17, 2007 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 17, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2007 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 17, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 4, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 4, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 25, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 26, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 25, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 25, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 21, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 21, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 19, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 1, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 14, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |