Drawing for CARESSABLY SMOOTH

USPTO serial 78858503

CARESSABLY SMOOTH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STRUCK, ROBERT J
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CARESSABLY SMOOTH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert A. Hyde

ROBERT A HYDE RECKITT BENCKISER INC399 INTERPACE PKWYPARSIPPANY, NJ 07054-1115UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Non-medicated toilet preparations all for use in connection with shaving or depilation; creams and lotions for use shaving or depilation; moisturizing creams, lotions and gels for use in shaving or depilation; preparations for shaving; depilatory preparations; depilatory waxes; preparations, including creams, gels and mousses, for use before, during and after shavingABANDONED—
008Razors; razor blades; epilators; instruments for use in shaving or depilation, namely, depilatory appliances, electric shavers, and non-electric shavers; structural parts thereforeABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 12, 2007MAB5ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Oct 12, 2007ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Oct 2, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 19, 2007EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Sep 12, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 24, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 22, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 3, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 3, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 3, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 2, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 5, 2007GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 5, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 5, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 13, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 13, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 13, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 10, 2007GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 10, 2007CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Mar 26, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 26, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 26, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 18, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 30, 2007GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 30, 2007CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jan 19, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 18, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 18, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 1, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 1, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 31, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 19, 2006MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Apr 18, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance