USPTO serial 78858717
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
North Hills, CA
WEST HILLS, CA
Calabasas, CA
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing, namely, t-shirts, tops, bottoms, hats, and sweatbands | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 18, 2007 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Dec 11, 2007 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Oct 19, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 27, 2007 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2007 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Sep 4, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 27, 2007 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2007 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Jul 10, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 10, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 10, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 8, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 8, 2007 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 21, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 18, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 20, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 20, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 20, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 20, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 24, 2006 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Jul 24, 2006 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 19, 2006 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |