USPTO serial 78858789
STERLING HOME
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HAYES, GINA CLARK
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with STERLING HOME?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Meri J Van Blarcom Gupko
MERI J VAN BLARCOM GUPKO WILEY MALEHORN & SIROTA250 MADISON AVEMORRISTOWN, NJ 07960-6108UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | Accent furniture, namely, step stools; step ladders; Closet accessories, namely, over the door organization for shoes, belts and clothing | ACTIVE | Nov 15, 2004 |
| 021 | Ceramic canister sets; Kitchen products and accessories, namely, trivets, trivets in sets with ceramic dishes, and expandable trivets; Oven to table racks; Wastebaskets, namely, garbage cans with step activated lids; Barware, namely, ice buckets, cocktail shakers, wine bottle holders, insulated wine coolers for bottles, bar tools and bar related products; Laundry goods, namely, ironing boards, ironing board covers, and racks for hanging clothes to dry; Stainless steel accessories, namely, trivets, expanding trivets, fixed trivets; Dinnerware, namely, dishes; Cookware, namely, open stock and sets | ACTIVE | Nov 15, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 22, 2008 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Dec 22, 2008 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Dec 22, 2008 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2008 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2008 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 6, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 6, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 5, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 5, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 6, 2008 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| May 6, 2008 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| May 6, 2008 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 7, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 7, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 13, 2007 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 9, 2007 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 1, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 30, 2007 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 30, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 30, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 30, 2007 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 21, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 5, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 5, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 27, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 24, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 24, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 23, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 19, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 19, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 29, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 29, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 29, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 2, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 21, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 21, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 19, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 19, 2006 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |