Drawing for HENNESSY ART OF BLENDING

USPTO serial 78859149

HENNESSY ART OF BLENDING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GRIFFIN, JAMES
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HENNESSY ART OF BLENDING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Marie V. Driscoll, Esq.

MARIE V DRISCOLL ESQ FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU PC866 UNITED NATIONS PLZNEW YORK, NY 10017-1822UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
004CandlesACTIVE—
009Compact discsACTIVE—
016Paper goods; napkins, menus, certificates, posters, bannersACTIVE—
025Clothing; merchandiseACTIVE—
033Spirits; alcoholic beveragesACTIVE—
035Providing advertising, marketing and promotional servicesACTIVE—
041Entertainment, namely live music concerts; sweepstake servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 25, 2007MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Apr 24, 2007ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Apr 24, 2007LOAPLETTER OF ABANDONMENT PROCESSED—
Apr 18, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 15, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 20, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 19, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 19, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 18, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance