USPTO serial 78859306
DIAMOND TECHNOLOGY PARTNERS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3782854Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 27, 2010
- Examiner
- VANSTON, KATHY
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with DIAMOND TECHNOLOGY PARTNERS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
DIAMOND MANAGEMENT & TECHNOLOGY CONSULTANTS, INC.
Chicago, IL
Other trademarks owned by DIAMOND MANAGEMENT & TECHNOLOGY CONSULTANTS, INC.
DIAMOND MANAGEMENT & TECHNOLOGY CONSULTANTS, INC.
Chicago, IL
Other trademarks owned by DIAMOND MANAGEMENT & TECHNOLOGY CONSULTANTS, INC.
DiamondCluster International, Inc.
Chicago, IL
Other trademarks owned by DiamondCluster International, Inc.
DiamondCluster International, Inc.
Chicago, IL
Other trademarks owned by DiamondCluster International, Inc.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael R. Graham
Michael R. Graham MARSHALL, GERSTEIN & BORUN LLP233 S WACKER DR STE 6300CHICAGO, IL 60606-6357UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business management and consultation services; business strategy consultation services; market research services; economic forecasting and analysis services; personnel management consultation services; consultancy services regarding business strategies, namely, vendor and product analysis, research and consultation; advising clients regarding business strategy, organization performance and business-related policy areas for improvement of business performance and organizational effectiveness; analysis of acquisition, merger or divestiture strategy, impact and performance; providing an Internet web site providing online information for use in developing business strategies; consulting services in the fields of data management for business | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 1, 1994 |
| 041 | Educational services in the nature of conducting seminars, workshops, and conferences in the fields of information technology and business management | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 1, 1994 |
| 042 | Information technology consultation services; providing research, consulting, planning, program management and implementation assistance services in the fields of computer hardware, computer software, information systems, data networks and development of related technologies, office and task automation, data communications utilizing digital, video and analog transmission and supply chain technologies; consulting services in the fields of data retrieval | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 1, 1994 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by DIAMOND MANAGEMENT & TECHNOLOGY CONSULTANTS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by DIAMOND MANAGEMENT & TECHNOLOGY CONSULTANTS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by DiamondCluster International, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by DiamondCluster International, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named DIAMOND TECHNOLOGY PARTNERS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 2, 2016 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 27, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 20, 2010 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2010 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 19, 2010 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 18, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 16, 2010 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 4, 2010 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2010 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Feb 3, 2010 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 22, 2010 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 16, 2009 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 24, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 22, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 20, 2008 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Nov 20, 2008 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 20, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 20, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 18, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 22, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 29, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 9, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 21, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 18, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 18, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 18, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 3, 2008 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 23, 2008 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Feb 12, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 12, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 10, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 9, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 11, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 11, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 11, 2007 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2007 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2007 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 24, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 24, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 24, 2007 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 24, 2007 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 24, 2007 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 24, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 24, 2007 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 22, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 22, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 20, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 19, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 19, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 19, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 19, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 19, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 9, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 18, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |