USPTO serial 78859732
APACK SELF-HEATING EMERGENCY MEAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- POWELL, LINDA
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with APACK SELF-HEATING EMERGENCY MEAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Nick Cirignano
NICK CIRIGNANO ZIEMER, STAYMAN, WEITZEL & SHOULDERS, LL20 NW 1ST ST FL 9EVANSVILLE, IN 47708-1201UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Self-heating emergency meal food package combinations consisting primarily of cheese, meat and/or processed fruit, for use by the military, outdoorsmen, remote travelers and for disaster relief efforts | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Food package combinations consisting primarily of bread, crackers and/or cookies | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Ameriqual Group, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Ameriqual Group, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named APACK SELF-HEATING EMERGENCY MEAL
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 21, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 21, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 21, 2008 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Aug 14, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 22, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 22, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 2, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 23, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 23, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 27, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 22, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 22, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 16, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 15, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 15, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 19, 2006 | GEAP | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2006 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 19, 2006 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 15, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 11, 2006 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Jun 11, 2006 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 19, 2006 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |