USPTO serial 78859994
A NATURAL PLUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3776371Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 13, 2010
- Examiner
- MORRIS, KRISTINA KLOIBER
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with A NATURAL PLUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Abbotsford, CA
ABBOTSFORD, CA
ABBOTSFORD, CA
ABBOTSFORD, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Rod S. Berman, Esq.
Rod S. Berman, Esq. JEFFER MANGELS BUTLER & MITCHELL LLP1900 Avenue of the Stars, 7th FloorLos Angeles, CA 90067UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Enzymes and proteins from egg whites for use in the manufacture of food and beverage products, nutraceutical, health food products, and processing aids in cheese production; Proteins and enzymes extracted from egg whites for laboratory and research use; proteins extracted from egg whites for use in the manufacture of cheese in the nature of processing aids for cheese production; animal derived pancreatic proteins and enzymes for use in cell biology applications; specialty egg proteins for use in cell culture for laboratory and research purposes; animal derived pancreatic proteins and enzymes for use in the manufacture of food products, infant formula, health food products, and nutraceuticals; specialty egg proteins and enzymes for use in the manufacture of immunodiagnostics, food and health food products | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 4, 2006 |
| 005 | Proteins and enzymes extracted from egg whites for use as a nutritional supplement in food and beverage products, nutraceuticals, and health food products, and for medical purposes; animal derived pancreatic proteins and enzymes for use as a nutritional supplement in food products, infant formula, health food products, and nutraceuticals; specialty egg proteins and enzymes for use as a nutritional supplement in immunodiagnostics, food and health food products; proteins and enzymes sold as a component ingredient of nutraceuticals and infant formula; animal derived pancreatic proteins and enzymes sold as a component ingredient of food and beverage products and health food products in the nature of infant formula, nutrition protein formulas for use as a meal replacement, and digestive aids; specialty egg proteins and enzymes sold as a component ingredient of food products and health food products in the nature of infant formula and iron fortified meal replacement bars | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 4, 2006 |
| 029 | Proteins and enzymes extracted from egg whites for use as a food additive; animal derived pancreatic proteins and enzymes for use as a food additive; specialty egg proteins and enzymes for use as a food additive; proteins and enzymes extracted from egg whites sold as a component ingredient of food and beverage products and health food products in the nature of dairy products, excluding ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurt, and meat; animal derived pancreatic proteins and enzymes sold as a component ingredient of food and beverage products and health food products in the nature of whey protein and low fat cheese | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 4, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by IC Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by NEOVA TECHNOLOGIES INC.
- Other trademarks owned by NEOVA TECHNOLOGIES INC.
- Other trademarks owned by NEOVA TECHNOLOGIES INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Similar marks named A NATURAL PLUS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 20, 2020 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Apr 13, 2019 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2016 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2016 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Mar 17, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 14, 2016 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 13, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 5, 2010 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 5, 2010 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 25, 2010 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 25, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 22, 2010 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2010 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Aug 14, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 14, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 24, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 2, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 12, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 24, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 23, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 23, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 23, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 29, 2008 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Apr 29, 2008 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Apr 29, 2008 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Apr 17, 2008 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 11, 2008 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Apr 3, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 1, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 10, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 10, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 16, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 15, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 15, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 26, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 6, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 25, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 25, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 25, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 25, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 25, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 15, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 23, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 23, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 23, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 20, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 20, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 20, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 12, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 18, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |