USPTO serial 78860093
AFFINITY LABS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3710611Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 10, 2009
- Examiner
- WHITE, RICHARD F
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with AFFINITY LABS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
AUSTIN, TX
AUSTIN, TX
Austin, TX
Austin, TX
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
russell White
Harlie Frost3838 River Place BlvdAustin, TX 78730UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Product development; intellectual property consultation; licensing of intellectual property | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 1, 2008 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by AFFINITY LABS OF TEXAS, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by AFFINITY LABS OF TEXAS, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Affinity Labs, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Affinity Labs, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named AFFINITY LABS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 17, 2016 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Nov 10, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 8, 2009 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 7, 2009 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 21, 2009 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 21, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 17, 2009 | PGSU | PETITION GRANTED - SOU FILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2009 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Aug 10, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 3, 2009 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2009 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 23, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 22, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 22, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 22, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 22, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 22, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 25, 2009 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jun 22, 2009 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 22, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 15, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 15, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 18, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 13, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 4, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 4, 2009 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2009 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 20, 2009 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Apr 20, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 1, 2009 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2009 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Feb 6, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 6, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 6, 2009 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Feb 6, 2009 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 6, 2009 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 15, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 15, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 13, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 13, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 19, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 30, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 15, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 10, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 20, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 20, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 19, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 6, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 6, 2007 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 6, 2007 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 24, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 24, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 21, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 21, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 21, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 20, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 20, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 20, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 18, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |