CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for SPIRE

USPTO serial 78860187

SPIRE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BRODY, DANIEL S
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SPIRE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Charles E. Weinstein, Esq.

Charles E. Weinstein, Esq. FOLEY HOAG LLPSEAPORT WORLD TRADE CENTER WEST155 SEAPORT BOULEVARDBOSTON, MA 02210

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Referrals for businesses and individuals in the fields of gift-purchasing servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 15, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 15, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 2, 2008EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Oct 2, 2008AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Oct 1, 2008EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Oct 1, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 20, 2008EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 15, 2008EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 15, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 7, 2008CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
May 7, 2008COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Nov 9, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 9, 2007DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Oct 26, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 26, 2007DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Oct 26, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 15, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 8, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 20, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 31, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 3, 2007ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Dec 27, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 27, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 8, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 8, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Dec 8, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 8, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Nov 16, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 16, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 16, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Oct 16, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 16, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 21, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 21, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 20, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 19, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance