USPTO serial 78860238
KIDPRO AUTO-GOALIE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEHKER, DAWN FELDMAN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with KIDPRO AUTO-GOALIE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Conrad C. Pitts
CONRAD C PITTS PITTS & ECKL401 E. TUSCALOOSA STREETFLORENCE, AL 35630-4725UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | TOYS AND SPORTING GOODS, NAMELY, AUTOMATIC SOCCER AND HOCKEY GOALIES, PRACTICE TARGETS FOR HOCKEY, SOCCER, FOOTBALL, BASEBALL AND BASKETBALL, AND PRACTICE KITS FOR HOCKEY, SOCCER, FOOTBALL, BASEBALL AND BASKETBALL CONSISTING PRIMARILY OF PLASTIC OR INFLATABLE SPORTS FIGURES, MOTORIZED BASES AND TRACK, MOVING TARGETS OR IMAGES, AND ACCESSORIES, NAMELY, SOCCER BALLS, HOCKEY STICKS, PUCKS, GOAL NETS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 19, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 19, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 24, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 19, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 8, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 5, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 5, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 5, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 24, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 10, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 21, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 19, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 26, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 26, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 25, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 13, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 12, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 12, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 11, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 11, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 20, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 20, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 20, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 21, 2006 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |