USPTO serial 78860913
VANILLAWARE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COWARD, JEFFERY
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VANILLAWARE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Grand Rapids, MI
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Karen Lee Orzechowski
KAREN LEE ORZECHOWSKI FARKAS + BARRY LLP1101 30TH ST NW STE 500WASHINGTON, DC 20007-3772UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Advisory services in the field of product development and quality improvement of software; Computer consultation; Computer disaster recovery planning; Computer programming for others; Computer services, namely, creating and maintaining web sites for others; Computer services, namely, data recovery services; Computer services, namely, designing and implementing network web pages for others; Computer services, namely, designing and implementing web sites for others; Computer services, namely, managing web sites for others; Computer site design; Computer software consultation; Computer software design for others; Computer software design, computer programming, or maintenance of computer software; Computer software development; Computer systems analysis; Consultancy in the field of software design; Consultation services in the fields of selection, implementation and use of computer hardware and software systems for others; Consulting services in the field of design, selection, implementation and use of computer hardware and software systems for others; Creating or maintaining web sites for others; Creation and maintenance of web sites for others; Creation and provision of web pages to and for third parties; Customization of computer hardware and software; Data automation and collection service using proprietary software to evaluate, analyze and collect service data; Design and development of online computer software systems; Design of computers for others; Design of home pages, computer software and web sites; Design of homepages and web-sites; Design, development and implementation of software; Development, updating and maintenance of software and data bases; Installation of computer software; Maintenance of computer software; Repair of computer software; Software authoring; Technical support services, namely, troubleshooting of computer hardware and software problems; Up-dating of computer software; Updating of computer programs for third parties; Updating of computer software for others | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 20, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 19, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 21, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 21, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 21, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 20, 2006 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |