Drawing for POWER CLEAN FORMULA

USPTO serial 78861001

POWER CLEAN FORMULA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CROWLEY, SEAN MICHAEL
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with POWER CLEAN FORMULA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert A. Hyde

Robert A. Hyde Reckitt Benckiser Inc.Morris Corporate Center IV399 Interpace ParkwayParsippany, NJ 07054

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Dishwashing compound, namely, dishwashing detergents for use in dishwashing machines; dishwashing detergent comprised of rinse, drying and spotting agents; dishwashing preparations in solid, fluid and gel form, namely, dishwashing detergent; dishwasher cleaner, namely, dishwashing detergent; polishing preparations for kitchen utensils and glassware, all of the aforementioned goods with or without a disinfective componentACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 27, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 27, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 23, 2008AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Sep 17, 2008EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 17, 2008TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Sep 17, 2008PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Sep 17, 2008PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Aug 6, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 6, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 20, 2008EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 20, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 28, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 28, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 20, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 8, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 7, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 8, 2007UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Dec 26, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 6, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 2, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 27, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 26, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 17, 2006CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Oct 17, 2006COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Oct 3, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 3, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 3, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 19, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 19, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 10, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 19, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance