USPTO serial 78861201
EXPIVIA INFORMATION AND TECHNOLOGY GROUP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NELSON, EDWARD
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EXPIVIA INFORMATION AND TECHNOLOGY GROUP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stephen L. Anderson
STEPHEN L ANDERSON ANDERSON & ASSOCIATES32605 HWY 79 S STE 208TEMECULA, CA 92592UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Computer consultation in the field of computer security; Computer disaster recovery planning; Computer network design for others; Computer security service, namely, restricting access to and by computer networks to and of undesired web sites, media and individuals and facilities; Computer service, namely, acting as an application service provider in the field of knowledge management to host computer application software for searching and retrieving information from databases and computer networks;; Computer services, namely, data recovery services; Computer services, namely, designing and implementing network web pages for others; Consultancy in the field of software design; Consultation services in the fields of selection, implementation and use of computer hardware and software systems for others; Database development services; Design of home pages, computer software and web sites; Design of homepages and web-sites; Design of homepages and websites; Design, creation, hosting, maintenance of websites for others; Development of software for secure network operations; Document data transfer one computer format to another; Hosting of digital content on the Internet; Hosting the web sites of others on a computer server for a global computer network; Maintenance of computer software; Monitoring the computer systems of others for technical purposes and providing back-up computer programs and facilities; Planning, development and technical support of electronic communications networks; Providing temporary use of non-downloadable computer software for tracking documents over computer networks, intranets and the internet; Recovery of computer data; Software authoring; Technical support services, namely, troubleshooting of computer hardware and software problems; Technical support, namely, monitoring of network systems; Updating of computer software for others | ACTIVE | Apr 5, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 23, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 21, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 22, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 21, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 19, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |