Drawing for BURSTS

USPTO serial 78861441

BURSTS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KEARNEY, COLLEEN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BURSTS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Margaret M. Serrano, Esq.

Margaret M. Serrano, Esq. PLANBRAND LLC2821 E OKLAHOMA AVEMILWAUKEE, WI 53207-3047UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Blanched nuts; Fruit and soy based snack food; Fruit-based snack food; Potato chips; Potato crisps; Potato sticks; Potato-based snack foods; Processed nuts; Roasted nuts; Shelled nuts; Snack mix consisting primarily of processed fruits, processed nuts and/or raisins; Soy-based snack foods; Vegetable-based snack foodsACTIVE—
030Cheese flavored puffed corn snacks; Cheese flavored snacks, namely, cheese curls; Cheese flavored snacks, namely, puffed cheese balls; Corn chips; Corn curls; Extruded corn snacks; Extruded wheat snacks; Grain-based chips; Microwave popcorn; Popcorn; Popped popcorn; Processed popcorn; Puffed corn snacks; Rice-based snack foods; Tortilla chips; Wheat-based snack foodsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 23, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 23, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 9, 2008EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Sep 9, 2008AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Aug 22, 2008TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Aug 22, 2008PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Aug 22, 2008PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Aug 20, 2008EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jul 21, 2008EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 17, 2008IROARESPONSE TO ITU OFFICE ACTION ENTERED—
Jul 17, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 16, 2008ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jul 9, 2008IROARESPONSE TO ITU OFFICE ACTION ENTERED—
Jul 9, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 25, 2008INCEITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR EXTENSION REQUEST—
Jun 3, 2008TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Jun 3, 2008PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jun 3, 2008PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Feb 20, 2008EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 18, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 20, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 20, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 30, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 20, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 28, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 8, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 4, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 2, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 21, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 20, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 19, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance