USPTO serial 78862004
FIRST PERSONAL REMOTE DEPOSIT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 21, 2007
- Examiner
- GARTNER, JOHN M
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 119
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with FIRST PERSONAL REMOTE DEPOSIT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*
Plus Government fees of $650
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
MUNSTER, IN, US
First Personal Financial Corp.
Orland Park, IL, US
First Personal Financial Corp.
Orland Park, IL, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James J. Saul
James J. Saul Faegre Baker Daniels LLP311 South Wacker Drive, Suite 4300Chicago, IL 60606UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Financial services, namely electronic check processing; converting financial items, namely cash and cash equivalents, into electronic currency; electronic funds transfer services, namely scanning, processing, transmitting, and depositing electronic funds | ACTIVE | Mar 30, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by NORTHWEST INDIANA BANCORP
- Other trademarks owned by First Personal Financial Corp.
- Other trademarks owned by First Personal Financial Corp.
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Similar marks named FIRST PERSONAL REMOTE DEPOSIT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 21, 2026 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2019 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 27, 2017 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2017 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Sep 27, 2017 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Sep 26, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 21, 2017 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 21, 2016 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2013 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2013 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Aug 24, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 7, 2013 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2013 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 9, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 9, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 21, 2007 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jul 13, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 13, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 8, 2007 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 8, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 8, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 8, 2007 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| May 25, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 24, 2007 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 24, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 24, 2007 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| May 24, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 24, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 5, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 5, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 30, 2006 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 30, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 21, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 11, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 11, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 11, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 11, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 8, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 26, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 26, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 25, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 25, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 24, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 20, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |