USPTO serial 78862109
HECKART
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HALMEN, KATHERINE E
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HECKART?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Beverly Hills, CA
Beverly Hills, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David G. Bayles
David G. Bayles Arent Fox LLP555 West Fifth Street, 48th FloorLos Angeles, CA 90013-1065UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | Brandy; wines | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | ART GALLERIES; PUBLICITY AGENTS, NAMELY, GALLERY ARTIST REPRESENTATION | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | Art brokerage | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Entertainment services, namely, motion picture film production and television production and post-production | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY, CREATING WEB SITES FOR OTHERS, CUSTOM COMPUTER SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT FOR OTHERS, HOSTING INTERNET WEB SITES FOR OTHERS ON A COMPUTER SERVER FOR A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK; ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN SERVICES; INDUSTRIAL DESIGN SERVICES; PRODUCT RESEARCH | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Heck, Aaron
- Other trademarks owned by Heck, Aaron
- Other trademarks in Class 033
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named HECKART
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 19, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 19, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 2, 2009 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 2, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 21, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 20, 2009 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2009 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 20, 2009 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 18, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 18, 2008 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 17, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 17, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 5, 2008 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 28, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 28, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 19, 2008 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 19, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 17, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 17, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 17, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 20, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 26, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 6, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 30, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 13, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 12, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 10, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 10, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 22, 2006 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Sep 22, 2006 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Sep 21, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 21, 2006 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |